What Is ISO 9001 Standard?

What Is ISO 9001 Standard?

Implementing a quality management system brings internal benefits to most organizations, as well as opening up opportunities vis-à-vis the outside world.

Internal benefits to the company include:

• improved customer focus and process orientation within the company;

• improved management commitment and decision-making;

• better working conditions for employees;

• increased motivation of employees;

• reduced cost of internal failures (lower rates of rework, rejection, etc.) and external failures (fewer customer returns, replacements, etc.); and last but not least,

• continual improvement of the quality management system.

The following external benefits are generated:

• customers are more confident that they will receive products conforming to their requirements, which in turn results in higher customer satisfaction;

• an improved image of the company;

• more aggressive publicity, as customers can be informed of the benefits of their doing business with a company that manages the quality of its outputs;

• more confidence that the companys products meet relevant regulatory

requirements;

• better objective evidence to defend product liability charges if such are brought by customers.

IMPLEMENTATION OF ISO 9001 STANDARD IN EDUCATION

IMPLEMENTATION OF ISO 9001 STANDARD IN EDUCATION

The economy has already met with various endeavours and concepts to build an effective quality management system. From the historical point of view, the most important ones are Deming Prize (1950), followed by Malcom Baldrige National Award (1987) and

international standards pertaining to ISO 9000 (1987) family. The implementation of this last standard grows continuously, either in Europe or in the world. In the period from 2001 to 2003, there was a slight stagnation, which was the consequence of the organisations having to adapt to the requests of ISO 9001:2000 edition of the standard. Croatia also actively participates in this trend, which show that at the end of 2004, organisations were certified, of which 970 of them were from Croatia.

The economy has already met with various endeavours and concepts to build aneffective quality management system. From the historical point of view, the most importantones are Deming Prize (1950), followed by Malcom Baldrige National Award (1987) andinternational standards pertaining to ISO 9000 (1987) family. The implementation of thislast standard grows continuously, either in Europe or in the world, as shown in the picture1. In the period from 2001 to 2003, there was a slight stagnation, which was theconsequence of the organisations having to adapt to the requests of ISO 9001:2008 editionof the standard. Croatia also actively participates in this trend, as illustrated by figures fromthe table 2, which show that at the end of 2004, 670,399 organisations were certified, ofwhich 970 of them were from Croatia.

The implementation of the stated standard in educational activities took a somewhat slower pace. Trends in Croatia do not completely follow the World ones . The 2002 and 2003 stagnation, which, as already mentioned, was mainly caused by transfer from one issue of the standard to the next one, had no particular impact to Croatia, partially because the data for Croatia includes standards from both the previous and the new issue of the ISO 9001 standard.

ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL STATE OF THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The implementation of an ISO 9001 conformant system must recognize that it is but a step in a long-term development of a continually improving QMS. Unfortunately, it is often the case that ISO 9001 is taken as a means to an end, where the implementation of a QMS is not the primary objective, rather certification is. As a result, SMEs may end up with stacks of documentation waiting to be processed that adds no value, but cost.

According to the requirements of ISO 9001, an organization must develop only six documented procedures: (1) control of documents, (2) control of quality records, (3) internal audits, (4) control of non-conformities, (5) corrective action, and (6) preventative action. A quality manual and several records are also required. The development of other procedures, work instructions, and other documents is largely at the discretion of the organization. From the very beginning of the process, it is therefore essential that SMEs establish a balanced view between a short-term focus (marketing/sales) and a long-term focus (achieving company-wide quality awareness through TQM). ISO documentation should be considered as an enabler along that way and SMEs must guard against the creation of unnecessary documentation.

However, even when such a view is adopted, many SMEs struggle to move from their initial state to a fully functional ISO 9001 QMS. Over the last several years, we have been involved in ISO 9001 implementation projects in seven different SMEs. The SMEs have ranged in size from approximately 20 employees to 500 employees. The SMEs have been drawn from a variety of sectors in Virginia, including manufacturing, distribution, and services. Based on our experience, we developed a schematic of initial states of an organization in terms of the

existence and functionality the documentation required by the standard while functionality is equated with an effectively operated QMS that leads to increased customer satisfaction and continuous improvement of business results. A successful QMS must be fully functional and appropriately documented. With that in mind, there are four main states in which SMEs can be located in the beginning of the implementation process:

1. Complete Death: No documentation, no functioning This is the state in which there is no indication of the existence and functionality of the QMS. No documentation exists and no processes are in place to help ensure the quality of the product. Relatively few companies will find themselves in this situation.

2. Informally Alive: No documentation, some level of functioning Many SMEs exhibit an organic structure characterized by an absence of standardization and the prevalence of loose and informal working relationships. SMEs operating in this state are more likely to rely on people rather than a system. In such situations, key personnel may resist documentation for two key reasons “(1) documentation is considered a waste of time and (2) documentation of processes and procedures makes the individual less dependable” . SMEs in this state perform some or all of the processes required by ISO 9001 and the QMS may function fairly well. However, they are not willing and ready to document those processes unless there is a cultural change lead by top management.

3. Formally Death: Some level of documentation, no functioning SMEs categorized in this state have documented processes and procedures at some degree, however, the documents are generally not followed and do not necessarily reflect the actual manner in which the organization undertakes its operations and management. This situation highlights the fact that the mere existence of documentation does not necessarily lead to a functional QMS. Moreover, such a situation may help perpetuate the view that ISO 9001 is a way for SMEs to market their products and services but that implementation of the standard requires stacks of documents that offer no value.

4. Formally Alive: Some level of documentation, some level of functioning Each SME considered in this state, achieves a unique combination of the existence and functionality of processes and procedures that may or may not be required by ISO 9001. As illustrated in Figure 2, this situation is closest to the desired state of full functionality (100%) of the ISO 9001 QMS and full documentation (100%) of this functionality

ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL STATE OF THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The implementation of an ISO 9001 conformant system must recognize that it is but a step in a long-term development of a continually improving QMS. Unfortunately, it is often the case that ISO 9001 is taken as a means to an end, where the implementation of a QMS is not the primary objective, rather certification is. As a result, SMEs may end up with stacks of documentation waiting to be processed that adds no value, but cost.

According to the requirements of ISO 9001, an organization must develop only six documented procedures: (1) control of documents, (2) control of quality records, (3) internal audits, (4) control of non-conformities, (5) corrective action, and (6) preventative action. A quality manual and several records are also required. The development of other procedures, work instructions, and other documents is largely at the discretion of the organization. From the very beginning of the process, it is therefore essential that SMEs establish a balanced view between a short-term focus (marketing/sales) and a long-term focus (achieving company-wide quality awareness through TQM). ISO documentation should be considered as an enabler along that way and SMEs must guard against the creation of unnecessary documentation.

However, even when such a view is adopted, many SMEs struggle to move from their initial state to a fully functional ISO 9001 QMS. Over the last several years, we have been involved in ISO 9001 implementation projects in seven different SMEs. The SMEs have ranged in size from approximately 20 employees to 500 employees. The SMEs have been drawn from a variety of sectors in Virginia, including manufacturing, distribution, and services. Based on our experience, we developed a schematic of initial states of an organization in terms of the

existence and functionality the documentation required by the standard while functionality is equated with an effectively operated QMS that leads to increased customer satisfaction and continuous improvement of business results. A successful QMS must be fully functional and appropriately documented. With that in mind, there are four main states in which SMEs can be located in the beginning of the implementation process:

1. Complete Death: No documentation, no functioning This is the state in which there is no indication of the existence and functionality of the QMS. No documentation exists and no processes are in place to help ensure the quality of the product. Relatively few companies will find themselves in this situation.

2. Informally Alive: No documentation, some level of functioning Many SMEs exhibit an organic structure characterized by an absence of standardization and the prevalence of loose and informal working relationships. SMEs operating in this state are more likely to rely on people rather than a system. In such situations, key personnel may resist documentation for two key reasons “(1) documentation is considered a waste of time and (2) documentation of processes and procedures makes the individual less dependable” . SMEs in this state perform some or all of the processes required by ISO 9001 and the QMS may function fairly well. However, they are not willing and ready to document those processes unless there is a cultural change lead by top management.

3. Formally Death: Some level of documentation, no functioning SMEs categorized in this state have documented processes and procedures at some degree, however, the documents are generally not followed and do not necessarily reflect the actual manner in which the organization undertakes its operations and management. This situation highlights the fact that the mere existence of documentation does not necessarily lead to a functional QMS. Moreover, such a situation may help perpetuate the view that ISO 9001 is a way for SMEs to market their products and services but that implementation of the standard requires stacks of documents that offer no value.

4. Formally Alive: Some level of documentation, some level of functioning Each SME considered in this state, achieves a unique combination of the existence and functionality of processes and procedures that may or may not be required by ISO 9001. As illustrated in Figure 2, this situation is closest to the desired state of full functionality (100%) of the ISO 9001 QMS and full documentation (100%) of this functionality

ISO 9001 Standards Document Control

The quality management system documentation shall include
a) documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,
b) a quality manual,
c) documented procedures and records required by this International Standard, and
d) documents, including records, determined by the organization to be necessary to ensure the effective
planning, operation and control of its processes.
The organization shall establish and maintain a quality manual that includes
a) the scope of the quality management system, including details of, and justification for, any exclusions
b) the documented procedures established for the quality management system, or reference to them, and
c) a description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management system.

ISO 9001 Standards Document Control

The quality management system documentation shall include
a) documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,
b) a quality manual,
c) documented procedures and records required by this International Standard, and
d) documents, including records, determined by the organization to be necessary to ensure the effective
planning, operation and control of its processes.
The organization shall establish and maintain a quality manual that includes
a) the scope of the quality management system, including details of, and justification for, any exclusions
b) the documented procedures established for the quality management system, or reference to them, and
c) a description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management system.

Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2008 year, the

implementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be done

in every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means that

SMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to their

limited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:

· Strong commitment and decision of top management;

· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with the

requirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.

This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align to

these requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources.

The success of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:

· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;

· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with the

requirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.

· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system

· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing and

maintaining of the system;

· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation of the system, but also for its supervising;

· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with the

suppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their own

personnel;

And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowment degree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2000 year, theimplementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be donein every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means thatSMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to theirlimited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:· Strong commitment and decision of top management;· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with therequirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align tothese requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources. Thesuccess of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with therequirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing andmaintaining of the system;· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation ofthe system, but also for its supervising;· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with thesuppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their ownpersonnel;And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowmentdegree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

A transparent quality management system, well conceived and applied, with adequate trained and motivated personnel, will be efficient and if technological level of endowments (working, supervising, measuring and monitoring equipments of the processes and product, working environment and infrastructure) will be comparable with the level of endowment of the top firms in the same activity area, as of the organization we refer to.

So, adopting a quality management system based on the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard is a strategic decision of the top management of an organization, much more for the management of SME that first of all has to analyse very well all the necessary resources, to put in balance both the necessary costs of the implementation and sustaining in function of a quality management system and the benefits brought, then to decide advisedly. Developing a quality management system gives both direct benefits and a contribution at the cost and risk management, being important not only for organization but also for the satisfaction of its clients and other interested parts.

The decision of designing and implementation of a quality management system in SME is influenced by proposed objectives, by the demand of the market, by products and services offered, as well as by objectives tendency of developing and the continuously improving of the performances of the processes of any organization.

A quality management system contains two essential elements. First, the most critical, refers to human resources and the other necessary resources for constant delivery of the adequate products and services to the client. Second refers to the existence of “documented quality management system” that is, usually, defined by documented policies, objectives, plans, processes, procedures and fabrication standards. The documented quality management system has to reflect the planning and carrying on the activities, made by SME. Both for the audit reported to the ISO 9001 standard’s requirements but also for improving activities, will need to generate adequate registrations to document the effective performance and to demonstrate the concordance.

Top management of SME has to be aware that the implementation of a quality management system according to this standard has to be approached as a project, to which are assigned resources and which has to be managed by a defined schedule.

First step is represented by defining the objectives of the schedule with an accent on those that will bring benefits for SME. For each objective must be defined the way in which will be measured his achievement, as well as the reference level. Schedule must also establish:

· An identification, documentation and continue improving system of SME’s processes;

· Stages that must be carried out for achieving the objectives regarding to the quality of the product and for long-term improving of a quality management system of SME;

After establishing the objectives, the next decision of the top management of SME refers to the type of approaching that will appeal to [3].

There are two ways of approaching:

a) to design the whole quality management system and then to be implemented;

b) to evaluate the processes and to appeal to improving techniques to build the system step by step, starting from existing elements.

The advantage of designing the whole quality management system is represented by obtaining a distinct structure, the main disadvantage being the tendency of a theoretical approach, separated from the realities and practices of SMEs. The performances of the personnel can also suffer because of the necessity to apply simultaneous a great number of new procedures.

The essential advantage of step by step approach is that if through evaluation of processes are determined both the adequate practices and the less acceptable, the efforts can be focused on those areas that ensure a maximum benefit. This approach has the disadvantage of the tendency to achieve a quality management system that is not so well structured and so is more difficult to understand and to apply by the personnel of SME.

The optimum approach represents a combination of the two variants. So, initially it is good to be established a general structure of the quality management system and then to be established frame models for documentation of the processes. Implementation activities will have in view identification and solving the problems and then the improving key processes of SME.

Indifferent the approaching way, top management of SME can decide if the conceiving and implementation project of the quality management system will be carried out through internal forces, or will be carried out external appealing to a specialised advising. In case they appeal to an advising firm, must exist an abiding collaboration between the two firm and a well tuned up contract to which will be affixed a plain schedule, with responsibilities and achievement terms.

Designing and implementation project of the quality management system cannot ensure solving all the problems. Changing the culture of an organization takes time and patience. Project must be accomplished through a well defined series of phases, with well established terms and with objectives that can be reached.

ISO 14001 and The Environment

The ISO 14000 family of International Standards on environmental management is a relative newcomer to ISO’s portfolio – but enviroment-related standardization is far from being a new departure for ISO.

In fact, ISO has two-pronged approach to meeting the needs of business, industry, governments, non-governmental organizations and consumers in the field of the environment.

On the one hand, it offers a wideranging portfolio of standardized sampling, testing and analytical methods to deal with specific environmental challenges. It has developed more than 350 International Standards (out of a total more
than 12000) for the monitoring of such aspects as the quality of air, water and soil. These standards are means of providing business and government with scientifically valid data on the environmental effects of economic activity.

They also serve in a number of countries as the technical basis for environmental regulations.

ISO is leading a strategic approach by developing environmental management systemstandards that can be implemented in any type of organization in either public or private sectors (companies, administration, public utilities). To spearhead this strategic approach, ISO establish a new technical commitee, ISO /TC 207, Environmental management, in

1993. This followed ISO’s successful pioneering experience in management system standardization with the ISO 9000 series for quality management.

ISO’s direct involvement in environmental management stemmed from an intensive consultation process, carried out within the framework of a Strategic Advisory Group on Environment (SAGE),set up in 1991, in which 20 countrie, 11 international organizations and more than 100 environmental experts participated in defining the basic requirements of a new approach to environment-related standards.

This pioneering work was consolidated with ISO’s commitment to support the objective of “sustainable development” dicussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

Today, delegations of business and government experts from 55 countries have participate actively within TC 207,

and another 16 countries have observer status. These delegations are chosen by the national standars institute concerned and they are required to bring to TC 207 a national consensus on issue being addressed by the commitee.

This national consensus is derived from a process of consultation with interested parties.

From its beginning, it was recognized that ISO/TC 207 should have close cooperation with ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, in the areas of management systems, auditing and related terminology. Active efforts are under way to ensure compatibility of ISO environmental management and quality management standards, for the benefit of all organizations wishing to implement them.

DOE Policy on ISO 14001

DOE Policy on ISO 14001

An early approach on ISO 14001 was to require DOE contractors to develop an ISO 14000-like EMS through a DOE-wide Order. Some contractors did not like the implication of the draft Order would ‘require’ a ‘voluntary’ standard. Although some viewed the draft Order as broad and flexible, the Order was never finalized. Likewise, largely due to a change of administration,DOE was not able to establish a formal Policy regarding ISO 14001.

The current approach within DOE is to encourage voluntary implementation of an environmental management system as an integrated component of the contractually-required Integrated Safety Management System (62 FR 34841).4 Further, DOE encourages implementation of an environmental management system where it makes good business sense for the individual site. The voluntary approach is supported by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy,5 and the integrated approach has been recognized as acceptable by EPA.6 DOE is also actively involved with the standard both at DOE sites and through an Interagency Working Group on ISO 14000. In addition, many DOE contractors are implementing ISO 14001 where it makes business sense for their individual site. Implementation is seen in a variety of ways from full third-party certification to implementation of various aspects of the standard.

ISO 14001 Standards – Nonconformance, Corrective and Preventive Action

ISO 14001 Standards - Nonconformance, Corrective and Preventive Action

ISO 14001:2004 Section 4.5.2, Nonconformance And Corrective Andrequires that organizations establish and maintain procedures that:

Preventive Action,

• Define responsibility and authority for handling and investigating nonconformance

• Take action to mitigate any impacts caused by nonconformance

• Initiate and complete the appropriate corrective and preventive action.

ISO 14001:2004 Section 4.5.2 also states that “…any corrective or preventive action taken to eliminate the causes of actual and potential nonconformances must be appropriate to the magnitude of problems and commensurate with the

environmental impact encountered.”

If any changes in the documented procedures result from any corrective and preventive action, you must implement and record these changes.

Nonconformance refers to any issues that do not meet or comply with the requirements established in the EMS or the ISO 14001 standard. Procedures developed under ISO Section 4.5.2 will provide the mechanism to handle

non-conformances and to ensure steps be taken to prevent a recurrence.

The procedures should include the following key steps:

1. Identify the problem

2. Determine the cause

3. Establish the solution

4. Document the solution

5. Implement the solution

6. Record the documentation and implementation of the solution

7. Communicate the solution.

Environment Awareness – Implement Environmental Management System

Save OUR EARTH!!! Go For ISO 14001 Standards – Environmental Management System. If all companies implement ISO 140001 Standards – Environmental Management System in the organization, it will help us to protect our environment.

Family Of ISO 14000 Standards

Family of ISO 14000 include standards as follows:

1. ISO 14001: Environmental management systems—Requirements with guidance for use.

2. ISO 14004: Environmental management systems—General guidelines on principles, systems and support techniques.

3. ISO 14015: Environmental assessment of sites and organizations.

4. ISO 14020: Include series (14020 to 14025) Environmental labels and declarations.

5. ISO 14031: Environmental performance evaluation—Guidelines.

6. ISO 14040: Include series (14040 to 14049), Life Cycle Assessment, LCA, discusses pre-production planning and environment goal setting.

7. ISO 14050: Terms and definitions.

8. ISO 14062: Discusses making improvements to environmental impact goals.

9. ISO 14063: Environmental communication—Guidelines and examples

10. ISO 19011: which specifies one audit protocol for both 14000 and 9000 series standards together.

ISO 14001 Standards

ISO 14001 is in fact a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system[/url] and the supporting audit programme.
The ISO 14001 series emerged primarily as a result of the Uruguay round of the GATT negotiations and the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992. While GATT concentrates on the need to reduce non-tariff barriers to trade, the Rio Summit generated a commitment to protection of the environment across the world.

After the rapid acceptance of ISO 9000, and the increase of environmental standards around the world, the International Standards Organisation (ISO) assessed the need for international environmental management standards. They formed the Strategic Advisory Group on the Environment (SAGE) in 1991, to consider whether such standards could serve to:

Promote a common approach to environmental management similar to quality management;
Enhance organizations ability to attain and measure improvements in environmental performance; and
Facilitate trade and remove trade barriers.
In 1992, SAGEs recommendations created a new committee, TC 207, for international environmental management standards. This committee and its sub-committees included representatives from industry, standards organizations, government and environmental organizations from many countries. What developed was a series of ISO14001 standards designed to cover:

-environmental management systems
-environmental auditing
-environmental performance evaluation
-environmental labelling
-life-cycle assessment
-environmental aspects in product standards

ISO 14001 was first published as a standard in 1996 and it specifies the actual requirements for an environmental management system. It applies to those environmental aspects over which an organization has control and where it can be expected to have an influence.

ISO 14001 is often seen as the corner-stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System and is the only ISO 14000 standard against which it is currently possible to be certified by an external certification body. However, it does not in itself state specific environmental performance criteria.

The Environment For A Healthy Business In ISO 14001 Standards

the Environment For A Healthy Business In ISO 14001 Standards

Growing scrutiny toward industry’s effects on the environment has made conformance with ISO 14001:2004 – a voluntary, internationally recognized Environmental Management Systems(EMS) standard – more important than ever. As more companies pursue ISO 14001 certification to demonstrate environmental commitment to their customers, shareholders and government agencies, many are discovering the benefits of partnering with Intertek. As one of the first accredited certification bodies, Intertek offers expertise, experience and know-how that no one else can deliver. Your certified EMS can help you reap the benefits of:

Improved overall performance
Your ISO 14001 certified EMS can help make your business more efficient and productive. Lower energy and raw materials use, reductions in waste and pollution, and mitigated risks of accidents and emergency situations translate into greater profitability and productivity.

Expanded market access
Your company’s environmental credibility and commitment to quality are established from day one. It will take less time to demonstrate the effectiveness of your EMS and earn your prospective customers’ trust and confidence, and you’ll enjoy access to markets you might not otherwise penetrate.

Improved corporate image
Your certification demonstrates your company’s commitment to environmental responsibility, fostering improved relationships with the community, shareholders, and governmental and environmental organizations.

Enhanced competitiveness
While helping you to operate more efficiently and profitably, your ISO 14001 certified EMS can instill additional confidence in shareholders, investors, insurers and your customers – making your business the clear choice in a highly competitive market.
Plus, you can maximize your human and financial resources by using your existing Quality Management System (QMS) as a basis for your EMS, taking advantage of the synergies between ISO 9001 and ISO 14001.

Role of Governments In ISO 14001 Standards

Role of Governments In ISO 14001 Standards

Although ISO 14000 is a set of voluntary standards that individual companies may or may not choose to adopt, governments can clearly have a role in providing information, establishing the necessary framework and infrastructure, and, in some cases, helping companies to develop the basic capabilities to adopt ISO 14000. There are two particular areas in which government action would be useful: (a) providing information on the sectors and markets where ISO 14001 certification is a significant issue and assisting sector organizations to develop appropriate responses, and (b) helping to establish a certification framework, based on strengthening national standards organizations and encouraging competitive private sector provision of auditing and certification services. At present, the World Bank is having discussions with a number of countries about how assistance could be provided with these issues.

Governments should see EMS approaches as part of a broad environmental strategy that includes regulatory systems, appropriate financial incentives, and encouragement of improved industrial performance. Such encouragement can really only be effective where there is cooperation at the government level between the relevant departments, including industry and trade, as well as environment. There is a growing interest in integrating environmental management issues into productivity or competitiveness centers designed to promote SME performance, but little information exists on experience to date.

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

ISO 14001 is a systematic tool that enables an organization in any market sector to focus on their situation, identify the relevant environmental issues and to lessen their impact to their benefit and the environment. It is part of a global response to the recognition that we are damaging the environment in which we all live. The cause and effect of the foremost world environmental issues, which are all due to mankind, are generally too vast and too intangible for us to grasp and so the slightly cliché expression ‘think global, act local’ is very relevant. Once the EMS is implemented and to become registered to ISO 14001, the external auditor will assess your EMS in two separate stages, on site. The first stage to understand your business activities and determine formal readiness for assessment and the second to check practical compliance with ISO 14001. After registration he will return at regular intervals every year to verify continual improvement and regulatory compliance, against your set objectives and your EMS. The external auditor should be seen as a wise friend, not a policeman. He should certainly explain his findings and assist the company to find ISO 14001 registration is not a cure for all environmental problems but I hope I’ve demonstrated that it is a worthwhile, if not essential business initiative that could enable your management to better manage your business, gain commercial advantage and minimize its environmental impact.

ISO 14001 Standards Video Clip